Thursday, February 4, 2010

The implications of moving fast

Fortun spends a considerable amount of time on the discussion of the word “fast” and what it means for the field of genomics. In chapter 3 we get a broad range of definitions for the word. I found this fascinating, as I have never thought about the contradictory nature of this word before. I can’t help but wonder what forces created a word that could mean both, “suitable for rapid movement” and, “firmly fixed or fastened” (p. 30). This disjointed, yet connected definition of fast is where we see the chiasmus.

As we continue to look at Fortun’s take on the genome industry I wonder if speed is a good thing. He even explains that, “genomics is faster, more intense than genetics” (p. 31). Didn’t we all learn early on that when we work too fast we make mistakes? I remember being told to take my time and look over my answers before finishing a test to make sure I didn’t make a mistake. Isn’t there something to be said for slowing down?

I also wonder why there is a need to be moving so fast. Is it a race to find the cure for genetic defects? I find it difficult to believe that scientists are working consistently fast just for the generosity or humanitarian aspect of genomics. Is it the race to win fame or a Nobel Prize? I find it more likely that scientists are working towards personal gain, as we have seen the characterizations of several leading scientists in the field to be little more than self-serving businessmen.

This idea of an egocentric scientist is best illustrated by the term/idea of a “biocelebrity” (p. 56). Big shot scientists like Craig Venter and Kari Stefansson don’t seem to be in the race for the promised human health benefits, they are in it to win for selfish gain. We can be sure of this from the personal accounts from others in the scientific community about their character. One explained Kari as having an “extreme need to win” and “incapable of humility” (p. 58).

This desire to win the genome race for selfish gain isn’t really important, but it does illustrate the interconnectedness of all four circles in the scientific process. Public relations do intersect all other aspects of the scientific race towards understanding the human genome.

1 comment:

  1. Your wondering about "whether speed is a good thing" is not uncommon and your suggestions as to "why" the speed are reasonable. While I would not deny the play of ego and drive on the part of the bio-celebrities we have seen portrayed, what other forces might be at work here...other than ego and selfish gain? Has Fortun given any clues as to where else we might look for the motives to move faster rather than slower? You can tell by my asking that I think there are other forces at work beyond the monumental egos of Venter and Stefansson.

    ReplyDelete